so i was just reading the news and there’s a story on cnn.com about the FBI urging police to look out for people carrying almanacs. the lead paragraph of the story:
“The FBI is warning police nationwide to be alert for people carrying almanacs, cautioning that the popular reference books covering everything from abbreviations to weather trends could be used for terrorist planning.”
so wait, i’m brown and i keep a map in my car. does that suddenly makes me suspicious? if they are worried about almanacs, i bet owning an encyclopedia gets you the death penalty. granted, the FBI did acknowledge that ownership and use of almanacs could be completely innocent but may be an indication of possible terrorist planning when combined with things such as surveillance. i dunno, i’d be a little more worried about the thing they are watching and the fact that they are watching it than the book they used to find it. let’s be serious, its not like almanacs and maps are the only source of information for terrorists. should the police be as concerned about a history book which has pictures of US landmarks as they are about an almanac? i understand their concern, but why be so limited in their scope? if they want to warn about almanacs, they might as well issue warnings about any book, magazine, video, tape, etc. that mentions anything about america.
but the real kicker is that under the patriot act, the person can be arrested and imprisoned indefinitely without ever seeing a lawyer, hearing the charges against them or even providing evidence of their innocence. basically, its a catch-22 situation. if you look suspicious and have a map or almanac with you, you’ll probably be arrested as a suspected terrorist and even though the ownership of the almanac may be completely innocent, you’ll never be allowed to prove it. good job john ashcroft. good to see you really thought this all through.